I received this by email today: I will remember the rooster by : 1. Numerous white spots that covered the coins 2. The eyelashes that seemed to be wedged in under the plastic airtites 3. The numerous scratches and scuffs that adorned the coin surface Something like this mock up of a silver rooster: The best news is all these extras came free of cost. Finally the very best is when you question the staff you get the standard statement -" its only bullion". So why do I pay a premium over the bar price ? Perth Mint you are destroying your collector base and annihilating the premiums on older coins. Instead of sending out silly emails please fix the quality problem - It is worse this year than ever before. But as you have record sales who cares? How will you Silver Stackers remember the Rooster ? Please post your feelings below
Record sales is no incentive to change anything . people need to vote with their wallet . Unfortunately ronnie they know people want their stuff & care less about quality its all about quantity now. To be fair on them they punch out a lot of coins & its a bit hard to QC every coin properly. .
To be fair I went to the PM and looked through all the 10oz and 1kg Roosters. They had about 30x 10oz and 8x 1kg coins. Every one was damaged. A few bad ones - yes no problem. You can't find a coin free of milk spots, scratches or other issues. Obviously the 1 and 2oz rolls are a time bomb as you can't see the damage until you crack them open. So please sell your PM rolls intact.
I've got 1 oz, 10oz and 1KG Rooster and they're all mint and perfect Not surprised that with such massive production duds make their way through to sales, but the fact that PM aren't interested in assisting you with a replacement or refund is pretty disappointing We're paying up for the coin, the least they can do is ensure we get a mint production. It's easy to buy in person because you can obviously look at it first, but there needs to be some sort of returns policy for online purchases
I doubt they are perfect. Do yourself a favour and get a good torch and shine it at queens head at an angle. Look carefully and you will see cloudy areas especially on the cheek and chin. Those are the earliest stages of milk spots which get darker with the passage of time. Its not for no reason that 90% of PCGS grading is the obverse. The reverse is usually ok I have gone through at least 50 x 10oz and 20x 1kg coins and have not found 1 free of marks. If I am right post the pictures Thanks
Yeah good point - I will have another look later TBH I def focused more on the Rooster side than Queen, because to me personally that's what I was more interested in I'll let you know how I go
If the mint is saying bullion, is less quality control and spotting is expected, that is game set and match. What is there to argue about. Most buyers of silver coin I gather don't care about it, as record sales indicate vast majority are not going to numi collectors. At the heart of it, isn't premium on modern coins just manipulation at a different layer for silver. End of the day PM calls it fabrication/marketing cost. Why would mint hire extra staff for QA or haven forbid reject a coin because it is mildly flawed, if it is sold at "manipulated" price,
Spotting is expected ?. You obviously havent been buying their products long enough to remember PM products they used to sell were excellent quality & milkspots on a PM coin were unheard of . If they didnt spot im sure they would have exceeded the record number they sold even with the problems. Its a business in the end & record sales are record sales .So if they are selling , production would be foremost on the agenda . Silver has its good & bad years & they are making hay while the sun shines . From a business side of things im sure most people would agree. This year could be a slow one . The bad part for them is they wont be sure how much effect the spotting & QC problems had on sales if it is a slow year . If they have another good year i doubt milkspots will go away as people are still buying them regardless.
I am not saying it's expected, it is PM who are hinting milked coins are expected. This might be new and disappointing development for collectors but if PM policy for bullion is now ok to have milk how can you argue. Sure we can be disappointed. I have a suspicion like RCM as PM transitions to 9999 just like Maples majority of bullion cons will be milky. My comment about manipulation is the secondary market premium, ie silver is silver why does a modern koala coin double in price, it's due to collectors manipulating the price.
Its a shitty design anyway. The French roosters, aka Gallic Rooster (aka; le coq gaulois) are a better looking cock... err cockrell... I mean, bird.
If you haven't worked it out by now, Ipv6Ready has a tendency to pontificate on stuff he has no idea about.
I think it's poor show and in the future there are going to be very disappointed SS who find their apparently mint PM coins covered in white spots. Premiums will vanish as will support for the PM.
And it's a basic issue of quality. With a tube of bullion coins you might get a few tiny dings here and there, but you don't expect massive quality defects with the materials. And with the premium bullion range sold by the mint in capsules, there is a higher quality expectation that matches the advertising and increased premium.
Obviously don't see exactly what you're talking about in your case, but I've noticed that from time to time on different kinds of Perth. I believe that's actually die fatigue -- not pre-milk-spots. I've never personally had issues with Perth Lunars. Then again, I also don't have gobs & gobs of them, either. The quality of the Kooks the past couple years, however, is a different story...
renovator has the right answer: "people need to vote with their wallet" If you (the buyer) are not satisfied with particular (or any) products from the PM (or any mint for that matter) don't buy those products. It's really that simple. I think it's good and fine (and arguably, necessary) to complain to the mint, but ultimately, if their product(s) are not satisfactory to you, don't buy that product(s). And, I do feel that public forums are a good place to vent and shame mints, dealers, and sellers that are unethical or providing consistently, objective poor business - BUT public forums are the wrong place to shame (or levy blame) that is not the fault of the mint, dealer, or seller. For example, bullion coins are not intended to be blemish-free and are sold as an investment vehicle....not as a collector vehicle. That certain bullion coins in the past have been utilized in the aftermarket as a collectable coin doesn't change the fact that the mint is pricing and selling them as bullion. If you expect to have reasonably blemish-free silver coins, buy collector coins instead.....but you will have to pay a premium for that extra production and QC cost the mint is putting into collector coins. Perhaps the most important responsibility for a mint is transparency to its customers. If the mint is claiming that their bullion coins are minted to a standard equal to their collector coins and that their collector coins are produced to be reasonably blemish-free, then they can and should be held to that standard. If they don't claim that, I don't see how bullion coins can be held to some, arguably, unreasonable standard. And if that is not satisfactory to you....don't support the product. Please don't misunderstand what my position is. I'm not claiming that no one has a right to complain to a mint about blemishes on bullion coins....but just know that the mint has no obligation to oblige your expectations which are based on past production of similar coins or future valuation of these coins. .
Summed up exactly right. The mints are not obliged to meet our expectations/wishes for perfect bullion coins. As collectors of bullion, we have set our own standards which were just never meant to be achieved with bullion. That we did in the past get super quality as standard, was a bonus. I haven't given up hope that it will eventually return to that. I do believe there must be pride within some mints that'll see a return. In the meantime, it's good and important we all keep banging on to them about it. We know they can do it, if the will is there. While i also agree that voting with your wallet is the way, i just can't bring myself to not buy any Perth bullion, at all. But i have cut back, and in general find little or zero problems with the few i do buy. So luckily i can at least keep those bullion collections going. But i did decide to stop completely a couple of years ago with the somalia elephant, for example. Gave up. I loved the series and would like to continue. But getting the current issue that year in problem free condition was a real headache, and just not worth going through it each year to try end up with a few good pieces.
Clearly people here do not know what milk spots look like. Here are pictures of coins including a slabbed proof - as they say a picture is worth a thousand words. These are earlier coins and the current ones are much worse. In the second picture the coin looks great until you shine a light on it at an angle. I haven't bothered to photograph the current coins - they look worse. Missinglink this is the perfect forum to shame the mint. I have approached them directly, written to members of staff and have received no reply. I have even questioned one of the production people at a public forum who refused to discuss the issue.
Okay, *those* are milk-spots in your last pic! But there's something else, too (die fatigue), that can happen with these, found smack-dab in the middle of the queen side, and can only really be seen when using a flashlight at an angle. Looks different than yours. Too cheap to properly maintain and/or swap out the dies in a timely manner, in order to save a few bucks. Just one more thing to worry about re: Perth "quality."
