My bolding. Australian shares were ranked the best performing investment over 10 years returning 9.1% - even though the current value of a ten year portfolio is still less than the peak it reached in 2007. Gold would have returned 10%, silver 15%, without the five dead years of trying to reclaim former highs. But that would be inconvenient for the articles purpose now wouldn't it.
You know, there's an old saying... you pay for what you get. These so called "economic expert" writers that dish out "advice" in the newspapers are delivering "advice" that's worth just about as much as people reading the articles pay... absolutely nothing.
To be fair - they do give it a good bashing every now and then http://www.theage.com.au/business/sell-gold-buy-base-metals-at-the-end-of-fear-20121221-2bqp2.html
The Weekend Australian has a great article on Gold. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mystique-of-gold-is-evergreen/story-e6frg8zx-1226573893832
Maybe they dont consider it an investment .Like cash .I would call cash an investment unlike many here .If you have enough of it it can make some decent money but its not considered an investment vehicle .. On the shares ... hmmm im sure theres many that have done their dough on shares in that time . I wonder how they measure it . A basket of blue chip shares maybe ? or an average on the asx ?It would depend on what shares you owned i would think . RE.. it would also be hard to gauge the returns being price & location specific .While highend properties have tanked some have made decent ground . Super ...well how you form an opinion on that is anyones guess .its been hit & miss along with the others depending on what fund . Metals are the one thing you can say ok i made or lost X amount because everyone is on the same playing field To sum it up ..i hate these type of articles they are far to general in nature & not indicative of the selective nature of investment classes while some can kick butt in one investment another falls in a heap because of it ..
No, the gutless wonders run the world from the shadows. The morons just do their bidding, and so on and so forth ...
I've been surprised to increasingly see 'fiat currency' as a term in the MSM. It always used to be 'money' or 'currency'. I suspect 'they' are getting us ready to adjust to the fact that 'fiat currency' has been replaced by 'money'. Maybe wishful thinking tho.