Discussion in 'Current Affairs' started by mmm....shiney!, Jan 20, 2019.
there are in anyone's definition of the word, Muslim arseholes. It's a fiction to think otherwise.
Muslims agree, they have their own arseholes
We aren't exactly exporting our own arseholes.
No need for more. Who really wants more arseholes?
So the issue is about arseholes rather than diversity then.
The libertarian viewpoint seems to be, as you espouse it, egalitarian. This is definitely not how the originators thought.
Edit - I'm not sure you actually think that.
no more arseholes where that is a member of society who through his or her actions adds to the problems of others.
diversity is a leftist frame, not a libertarian one.
not happy jan
Political equality, not economic equality.
All I’m saying is that diversity is not the problem. Arseholes are. Anning’s justification for promoting conformity is misguided. His immigration policy based upon race/religion therefore is also wrong.
not going to forget it, arseholes
Libertarians let in any old arsehole. In the end, it is a matter of numbers and power. What do you want?
Political equality is a slogan.
I kinda got the point
Most people don't seek it.
The basic idea is to disempower a group and redistribute their labour to others
Shiney, no country wants libertarians outside metro Sydney in one area and even then, the fact remains the Lib Dems were positioned first on the Senate ticket in that electorate on the ballot paper. I was there. It really sucked to know the migrants voting for the Libs then ticked that box. Scummy. You know it.
Separate names with a comma.