Most Aussie betting agencies have the libs at 1.13 mark I got in a week ago at 1.17.....not a bad one I think for 6 months better than what the banks are currently offering.
And I thought I was the only one who noticed. I've been treating that particular proposition bet as a term deposit with rate of variable interest. Expect some violatility with the odds if any scandals/gaffes emerge, especially as we get closer to Sept. Plus, winnings from wagers are not liable for income tax as they are classified as 'windfall gains'.
Sportsbet currently paying 1.16 for coalition win. That equates to a better than 27% annualised return - tax free. Other interesting propositions: Paying 1.62 that greens win zero house of rep seats. That could be good value if other people think like me - only Brandt has to lose his seat and its a winner (106% annualised return). Paying 7.00 that the coalition take control of the senate - seems good value to me (1028% annualised return)
Thanks for the tips - will place some later this arvo. Don't think the Greens will hold as Libs won't pref them again.
4.75. What is interesting is that Gillard being leader is at 1.85, while Rudd is nearly even with her at 2.00.
As a seasoned current events gambler, I'll offer the following advice: Bet on the result that you rationally think will happen, and not what you emotionally want to happen.
I think you are 100% correct. Sports betting odds is usually a a fairly accurate collective opinion of the population, and odds should be heeded. In this case, it would suggest (barring some unforeseen cockup) that the Coaslition is an absolute shoe-in for the house of reps, but not so much the senate.
What price a recession in the next three years irrespective of who wins the next federal election? Regards Errol 43
Hopefully this doesn't derail the thread but I just had a thought regarding this. I wonder how many times the favourite in any particular betting scenario does win. Let's take AFL for example and say you bet on every match during the year for the favourite, using the same amount of money each time and let's say a few hours before each match. I wonder if you would make a profit or loss and if profit how much it would be and whether it would be worth it over the whole year. Does anyone know of any study like this? Or have any thoughts on it?