I don't believe that Joe Hockey alone can sign this into legislation. I expect it would need to go to be passed by parliament to be law? Anyhow, it's a bit difficult to find something that's not there, so if it can't be found by anyone in this forum then it probably doesn't exist.
I'd be hesitant about claiming something doesn't exist based on the assumption that what forum members can and can't find is definitive. There could be regulatory obsfucation or technicalities we don't know about. From the RBA: Some commentary:
Further commentary: Australia already under effective bail-in regime http://www.cecaust.com.au/bail-in/A...ia-already-under-effective-bail-in-regime.pdf
Thanks SP. All that stuff kind of paints a picture that bail-ins are in place, without allowing us to actually be able to pin it down in black and white print.... ....or in other words, the politicians and lawmakers have done a perfect job in obfuscating the fact that bail-in laws are here. Aside - As for the FCS I could envisage that in a full scale meltdown we'd blow the $20 billion, but the electorate would demand it be expanded. Money printing ensues.....
Technically I think any bail-in laws are just changing the nature of the bail-in. By definition "your" savings are not yours the second they are given to an FRB bank. They are an investment with a risk that you won't get your capital returned.
Hi Bernie, Back to your original question, What Australia are you referring to? http://clra.info/1973-the-birth-of-corporate-australia-the-death-of-the-commonwealth-of-australia/ Flash
Same old Australia, we have just replaced one socialist General Secretary with another socialist General Secretary.
Welcome back Old Codger!!!!You mean We changed a man with a suppository of all knowledge with a CEO from Goldman Sachs. Regards Errol 43
raven is spot on, and it's doesn't need to pass through the house again if it's only subordinate legislation, check APRA, it is merely procedural changes to how the banks and Central banks are required to act according to the regulator. I posted on this before, just go to their website http://www.apra.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx and search "bail-in" if you want to do some reading.
Subordinate legislation is when a Current Act delegates powers to a Regulator body, changes only need the Authority of the Regulator as the original Act does not need to be amended, hence does not need to pass house nor receive Royal Assent.