A Highly Probable Scenario for Silver

Discussion in 'Silver' started by leon1998, Dec 6, 2015.

  1. leon1998

    leon1998 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2014
    Messages:
    690
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    United States
    is for Silver spot to stuck inside a trading range between US$10 and US$15, for an extended period, e.g. 5 years; until all the perma bulls throw in the towel. :D

    Don't get me wrong; there's still money to be made. If you can trade paper silver back and forth, e.g. buy @10 and sell @15; short @15 and cover @10; one round trip is very profitable. And you could use the proceeds to buy more physical silver @10.

    Just a thought. :p
     
  2. rainy day

    rainy day Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    terra australis
    The banks or manipulators are doing this to pry all the physical silver from our hands to place in theirs, because of their awareness of the imminent collapse of the paper?
     
  3. willrocks

    willrocks Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    7,777
    Likes Received:
    7,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's one possible scenario. I wouldn't go as far as saying "highly probable".
     
  4. prince_of_sales

    prince_of_sales New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Something is going to happen, and it's going to trigger inflation. I don't know what, I don't know when, but it will happen and all the Wall Street banker types will push out of equities and into the safe haven assets.

    But first we need to bottom.

    My target for Gold is $900, and my target for silver is $10-$11.
     
  5. SpacePete

    SpacePete Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2014
    Messages:
    12,433
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    48
    My scenario that would result in stagnant prices: slow collapse, a slow wind down of society punctuated by short, violent upheavels -- the last gasps of a soon-to-be corpse -- and then there will be too few to care about silver anymore. No one will remember us, and our once cherished stacks of silver will languish in forgotten vaults, eventually to be ground back into the crust as the continents continue their slow drift across our slowly dying planet.
     
  6. Silverthorn

    Silverthorn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,505
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48

    Someone is in a cheerie mood today. :p
     
  7. fishtaco

    fishtaco Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Messages:
    2,293
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Perth WA
    Who really cares if it goes up or it goes down? either you have some or you dont have some. if you do have some and you cant afford too keep it forever you really couldnt afford to buy it in the first place!
     
  8. mmissinglink

    mmissinglink Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Everywhere...simultaneously


    Damn, when's that novel coming out...I want to read it!! ;) :D




    .
     
  9. mmissinglink

    mmissinglink Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Everywhere...simultaneously


    Not true at all.

    The other scenario is you run into an unexpected / unforeseen tragedy and are forced to liquidate assets like (some or much of) your silver stack.

    I've heard of it happen more than once.



    .
     
  10. Jim4silver

    Jim4silver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2015
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    814
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    US
    There are many different scenarios of how silver could perform over time. It will depend on what is going on in the world and there is no way to know for sure how that will play out. Due to current world events, I would opine that it looks more likely than not that something(s) could happen that makes PM's become a go to "investment".

    One possibility that I believe will eventually play out (I don't know when) is where some financial/banking/monetary disaster(s) occurs which results in people from poor to rich wanting to put money into hard assets. That idea seems impossible as we sit here now with most folks not even wanting to use cash anymore, let alone think in terms that gold and silver equate with wealth/value. However, if we consider what event(s) could happen down the road it appears (to me at least) plausible that there could be a time coming where all types of people decide to put some $$$ into hard assets again. If so, there is not a whole lot of PM's to go around if people all wanted the real metal.

    I have read that approximately 700 million ounces of silver are mined each year. The real number might be a bit more or less. Right now 700 million ounces equals $9.8 billion at $14 spot silver. That is not much money when talking about global figures of wealth throughout the world. The US burns through $3.5 Trillion or more per year, just to put $9.8 Billion in perspective. Bill Gates alone is worth $79 Billion or so. I am just saying there is a lot of "money" out there held by people of all walks of life. If some big bad event(s) cause a loss of confidence in paper products, you might see those who still have money left start buying PM's and other hard assets.

    Think of all the wealth that is currently in paper products or electronic digits. If there were to be a loss in confidence in these systems, to where would the money go? If there were any of the following bad events to occur, a loss in confidence of non physical assets could happen: a derivatives market blow up- which would spread to other markets quickly, some world government(s) defaults that cause certain currencies to become worthless quickly, global wars (much worse than what we have now) that lead to market instability/upheaval.

    We are in precarious times with respect to the "health" of many large and powerful nations, that is if you look at true debt levels vs. spending and entitlements, etc, and in what direction we appear to be heading (making things better vs. making them worse, ie nearing $19 T debt now and heading higher in HUGE amounts recently). This can't go on forever like everything is peachy. Further, we have so many global conflicts/wars that show no end in sight and are getting worse by the day (think Russia vs. Turkey- and all other countries "involved" in that due to their relations with the involved parties), that some event someday will set off a much larger conflagration I believe.

    All of these things I mentioned would have, historically, caused PM's to rise. I know things are different today with the sheep not even wanting cash anymore and preferring plastic and computer payments, but the wealthy and the 1%ers are not dumb and if the "event(s)" were bad enough they would move more heavily into traditional hard assets. And if they started moving $$$ into PM's, eventually those down the ladder would want to do so as well, but probably later on and at higher prices.

    PS Even without any of the above events taking place, we could over time see PM prices and the whole commodity sector improve due to normal market cycles, but I don't think PM's will reach very high numbers under this scenario like they would should some bad world event(s) be the cause of movement upward.

    Just my opinion.

    Jim
     
  11. Jim4silver

    Jim4silver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2015
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    814
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    US

    mmissinglink is correct. Nobody should have so much in PM's that they have to liquidate to pay every day bills and such. Definitely need to diversify.

    Jim
     
  12. fishtaco

    fishtaco Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Messages:
    2,293
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Perth WA
    ? dont you mean fishtaco is correct? lol mmissinglink is saying the opposite to you lol
     
  13. Jim4silver

    Jim4silver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2015
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    814
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    US

    I am saying if someone is so heavily invested in silver or gold that they have to liquidate it when a bill comes due, then they have too much in PMs.

    This of course would not be a problem per se in a rising market because you would profit when you sold to pay the bill. But if you had to sell now and bought at 20 you are SOL. But if you had diversified you would have the cash to pay the bill or liquidate some other asset that was in the black like maybe a stock.


    Jim
     

Share This Page