I wish I could get paid big $$$ to sit around playing solitaire and make sure I did not find anything
"failed to find enough evidence to support a legal case" is a lot different to 'concludes no manipulation'
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/libor-may-be-manipulated-silver-not-cftc-conclude CFTC to conclude 4 yr report with conclusion that Silver is NOT being manipulated. [sarcasm] So that's all right then [/sarcasm]
So, so they have concluded not to investigate... so they have watied for years to decide not to bother? Totally Ridiculious, but totally normal given this is 2012 and double speak is the norm.. Id like to see if this has silenced anyone, cant see how this isnt just a blatant.. sorry guys.. were not investigating SCHITT as we dont want to expose ourselves as being the paper-trade makers of the silver futures derivatives fiasco... HAHA>. thanks for the cheap silver los bastardos! 1for1
It's like anything, if you want to prove there is nothing dodgy going on then do a Government run full investigation/audit to find nothing, then you can say in the main stream news every day, "we already had that investigation and nothing was proved so lets move on, case closed" Same will happen with this Gold Audit in the US, same happens here, remember the Referendum to become a Republic? we get a botched up vote just so we can say "Oh remember we already voted on this so lets move on, case closed"
I don't see the real uproar in this. If the people making the allegations have some proof worth investigating the they should have put it forward so the CFTC had no choice. Obviously they didn't. I'm not saying it wasn't/isn't happening just that obviously if it is these people are much smarter than those making the accusations.
I think the accusers are missing one key ingredient = evidence. No amount of political influence will trump cold hard facts. Hence why they have the supreme court, if there is sufficient evidence use the court system and blow the CFTC out of the water and have them all sacked and jailed on corruption charges.
He hasn't gone to prison yet. If only it were true, evidence trumping influence. Justice. OJ Simpson is one of many people. Big Tobacco are one of many companies. Central Banks are one of many orgs.
Well if they can impeach a POTUS for having his dick sucked in the oval office surely they can provide enough evidence to get a supreme court decision.
So the FT puts out a premature and misleading article about the investigations into the proven manipulations of the silver market (Andrew Macguire, Ted Butler, GATA have all presented evidence). I wonder why they would do that? London being the centre of Libor scandal, the place Andrew Macguire was run down, the JP Morge whale, the destination for the MFG loot, and so on, I wonder if the FT has a vested interest in the preservation of the status quo? What sort of role will the Pay Per View FT occupy if another scandalous affair is shown to have occurred right under their (blind) watch?
Some of the newer silver stackers may not be aware of of the fact that we have some video footage of the JP Morgan "thug" car chasing Andrew McGuire, as they race over a London bridge. Search the SS archives to see this incredible footage. Also, folks, you those who care, I have an audio soundtrack on my PC, somewhere... of the sound of the JP Morgan "thug" car, revving its powerful V12 engines, just before it accelerated towards Andrew (who was in a V6). PS: Feel free to click the "Say Thanks" button. PPS: For anyone who wants to know, I believe that I can dig up the menu of what the JP Morgan thugs ate for breakfast (and also what style of coffee they drank) on that fateful day.
Geez... I was almost knocked down by a car on Queen Street today. A lucky shave. My friend at work, who's also a stacker, thinks that it may have been JP Morgan thugs, because they know that I've been blabbing about their operation here on SS. Andrew McGuire and myself are hunted men...
