It actually says in the article that the funds will come from cuts in other areas of government spending.
The advantage of this scheme over Quantative Easing is it puts money into Main Street (as opposed to Wall St. ) through the wages of these workers. The problem is there'll be a screaming rush of people into construction industry at the expense of all other areas of the economy. (And the shysters will cause problems too, starting up overnight, hiring unqualified staff and then disappearing just as fast, leaving problems (often life threatening risks) behind them). I'd like to say the best stimulus method is Rudd's approach of putting cash directly into the hands of tax payers to spend where THEY need it most. This way it can go to mechanics, doctors, dentists, clothes, food..and yes big-screen tv's. As I started though, I'd like to say that, but the best cure is prevention ...and not needing stimulus in the first place and minimise the boom/bust cycle! P.S. It was a scrappy, speech by Obama, strained by desperation and anger. P.P.S The smarmy looks on the faces of the congressmen in the audience made me cringe, just disgusting.
I'm not one for encouraging mal-investment. Reduce the size of the state, and let the market do it's thang.
Good clip hawkeye I like the line..... Budget ceiling ...credit score ...dont worry about that i'l just print some more
When one has a cup to bail out water coming in by the bucketload, its just a matter of time. Doesn't matter whether you throuw your cup of water out the front, the back or the side. Doesn't matter if you rename your cup, a "fluid reduction enabler" to give assurance to all the other passengers on the boat. Just a matter of time before things sink.
You're obviously a fluid reduction enabler half empty kind of person when it comes to the U.S. economy then.