i can understand why 2oz is the lowest in the charts, but why 1/2oz is the 2nd lowest? I would have chosen 1/2oz over 1/4oz from collector point of view, and premium will be lower (??)
I find the 2008 Mouse mintages extraordinary, especially in comparison to Series 1 mintages. Only 96 Mouse and 97 Ox have lower mintages for most sizes. You can see that the 2008 Mouse is going to be the key date for completing sets (assuming demand for these Perth Mint gold lunars remains strong going forward)
The mint hasn't even sold out of the 1/2oz Rabbits and Tigers... Awesome work with these charts. Needs doing for Series I
Yeah will do .... just in the middle of trying to teach a 5 month old how to eat solids ... operative word being EAT .... not spit back out ..... not play with it ..... not put it up nose etc
I wonder what the likelihood is of them 'completing the mintage' of the S1 gold Lunar 1 OZers? If I were a European investor with a stack of S1 gold Lunars, and I witnessed the Perth Mint reminting silver Kooks from the nineties, maybe I'd get nervous about the rarity premium on my gold Lunars. Maybe I'd flog them off - there's a few showing up for sale. A few of them could be almost doubled in issuance before meeting their limit. Any guesses as to how likely?
finicky I think it's 'nil' Lunar Series 1 has been closed off, and they've moved to Lunar Series 2 Kooks were always allowed to be reminted up to 300k, there is no 'Series' to close off